Dear Deeply Readers,

Welcome to the archives of Syria Deeply. While we paused regular publication of the site on May 15, 2018, and transitioned some of our coverage to Peacebuilding Deeply, we are happy to serve as an ongoing public resource on the Syrian conflict. We hope you’ll enjoy the reporting and analysis that was produced by our dedicated community of editors contributors.

We continue to produce events and special projects while we explore where the on-site journalism goes next. If you’d like to reach us with feedback or ideas for collaboration you can do so at [email protected].

Social Media Buzz: McCain Reactions, Khatib’s Failed Facebook Diplomacy

Millions of Syrians are using social media tools such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Skype to disseminate and discuss the conflict. Each week Syria Deeply monitors the online conversation in English and Arabic, pulling out the highlights in a feature called the Social Media Buzz.

Written by Mohammed Sergie Published on Read time Approx. 3 minutes

Sen. John McCain skipped the Sunday talk show circuit this week and made a quick trip into northern Syria, meeting with rebel commanders in rural Aleppo. Mouaz Moustafa, an opposition activist and executive director of Washington advocacy group the Syrian Emergency Task Force, used Instagram to disseminate proof (see tweet below) of the senator being in Syria, at the doorstep of a lounge in the rebel-controlled border post Bab al-Salameh.

> With senator John McCain in free #syria > — Mouaz Moustafa (@SoccerMouaz) May 27, 2013

Reactions from opponents of the Assad regime were cautious, and most wanted to see more action from the U.S. (especially arms shipments) before cheering Senator McCain’s bold move. Regime loyalists were livid. A usually quiet, U.S.-based pro-Assad group lashed out at McCain for visiting “terrorists” and the U.S. government for “supporting those terrorists who already did the [9/11 bombing].” Comments on the post ranged from disbelief that Syrian land isn’t completely controlled by the Assad regime to multiple calls on the Syrian army to bomb and mutilate McCain.

Three months ago, then-National Coalition president Moaz al-Khatib initiated a round of Facebook diplomacy, launching an initiative via the social networking site to negotiate with representatives of the Assad regime. The proposal, and its delivery method, prompted heated discussions in and out of Syria. (The talks never materialized, and Khatib made other unsuccessful diplomacy overtures before his resignation.)

Last week, Khatib lobbed out another offer to the regime, which was quickly panned. The plan (click here for the English version) spelled out an orderly, peaceful transition to democracy, allowing President Bashar al-Assad and 500 of his associates to leave the country without granting them amnesty.

Activists and observers of the Syrian conflict were quick to question how al-Khatib formulated the proposal, and if this was the vision of a group or an individual. Other activists mocked al-Khatib’s optimistic vision (below) as the war rages and regional players such as Hezbollah (an Iran-funded Lebanese party designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S.) increase their role in the deadly conflict.


During this week’s National Coalition gathering in Istanbul the opposition leaders’ infighting has been exposed in both social and traditional media. But the issue dominating the press in the last seven days is the ongoing battle in Qusayr, near Homs, led by the Shiite militant group Hezbollah.

This weekend Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, gave a speech on the rationale behind sending his group to fight Syrian rebels. He shifted from defending Shiite civilians and shrines from extremist Sunnis to protecting the so-called “resistance axis” that includes Iran, Damascus and Hezbollah, and defies Zionist and U.S. designs on the region.

Hezbollah was founded as a proxy of the Shiite theocracy in Iran. In an effort to frame it as a non-sectarian Islamist group, Nasrallah said the party sent fighters to protect Bosnian (Sunni) Muslims against Serbian forces two decades ago.

It didn’t take long for users of Twitter to check the accuracy of this statement, and a former Balkans reporter weighed in (below). On Facebook, Saleh el-Machnouk, a young Lebanese politician who opposes Hezbollah, pointed out another inconsistency (Nasrallah saying he would never stand with the U.S. and the West in any conflict, yet allegedly placing Hezbollah fighters in NATO’s camp in Bosnia).

> @troublejee @jenanmoussa No, Hezbollah was NOT fighting in Bosnia. “Arab Mujahedin” in Bosnia did. This was relatively small group > > — Harald Doornbos (@HaraldDoornbos) May 27, 2013

Inside Syria, the reactions of former Hezbollah supporters demonstrated the extent of the party’s diminished standing among many Syrians. 


[]: []:

Suggest your story or issue.


Share Your Story.

Have a story idea? Interested in adding your voice to our growing community?

Learn more